813 So. 2d 724 - Evans v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 692 So. 2d 755 - Lester v. State · 490 So. 2d 849 - Killingsworth v. State · 731 So. 2d 1135 - James v. State · Mitchell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"It is well settled in this [S]tate [ ... ] that a change in the indictment is permissible if it does not materially alter facts which are the essence of the offense on the face of the indictment as it originally stood or materially alter a defense to the indictment as it originally stood so as to prejudice the defendant's case."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“It is fundamental that courts may amend indictments only to correct defects of form, however, defects of substance must be corrected by the grand jury.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“make its own independent review of the record.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.