Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 813 So. 2d 787 - Rusche v. State

813 So. 2d 787 - Rusche v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Gerstein v. Pugh · Brown v. State · 562 So. 2d 1206 - Riely v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under harmless error analysis, the failure to provide [the defendant] with an immediate informal “probable cause” hearing shortly after the State began proceedings to revoke his probation -will not be seen to render ineffective the subsequent formal proceeding at which [the defendant] was afforded all the due process protections required under Mor-rissey unless there is some showing of prejudice to [the defendant] arising out of the failure to conduct the hearing— that prejudice necessarily extending beyond the issue of the State’s right to continue his confinement in the interim.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) a preliminary proceeding, in the nature of a probable cause hearing, to be held promptly after a probationer is detained for an alleged parole or probation violation, and (b) a more formal final revocation hearing at which the prisoner is afforded a number of constitutional protections as outlined in [ Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 487-88 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972)].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “all the necessary due process safeguards”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.