Bivens v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 13, 2002

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-02-13

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2017

1 state decisions

Relies on 790 So. 2d 550 - Major v. State · 797 So. 2d 573 - Jeffries v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-02-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3,850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550, 553 (Fla. 3d DCA) review granted, 797 So.2d 586 (Fla.2001).

¶2WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.