Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 813 So. 2d 996 - Olivera v. State

813 So. 2d 996 - Olivera v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 63 So. 2d 339 - Kaminski v. State · 418 So. 2d 1000 - Walsh v. State · 540 So. 2d 844 - McFadden v. State · 520 So. 2d 81 - Simeon v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unless the jury believed that he had passed the lie detector test, it is hard to fathom that his testimony would have led to the defendant's conviction as there were no other witnesses or physical evidence linking the defendant to the crime”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.