Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 813 SW2D 318 - State v. Jacobs

State v. Jacobs’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
January 1996
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Duren v. Missouri · Jones v. Howard · Bottoson v. Florida · Holland v. Illinois · Cabrera-Martinez v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) that the group alleged to be excluded is a ‘distinctive’ group in the community; (2) that the representation of this group in venires from which juries are selected is not fair and reasonable in relation to the number of such persons in the community; and (3) this underrepresentation is due to systematic exclusion of the group in the jury selection process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.