Albert v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2004
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Maleng v. Cook · Swanson v. State · State v. McCraw
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no proceeding before a court at which the grounds alleged could have been presented.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Arendall v. Morgan“in custody” for purposes of the Post-Conviction Procedures Act, but he is neither”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hickman v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.