Jd McCauley Harris Jd v. E McCauley E’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably Kubicik v. Apex Oil Co. (1989), Rodriguez-Roman v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1996)
15 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. John C. Grimberg Co. · Trustees of the Amalgamated Insurance Fund v. Geltman Industries, Inc. · Peter Starr Production Co. v. Twin Continental Films, Inc. · Center for Nuclear Responsibility, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission · Klenske v. Goo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Whenever a civil action is filed in a court as defined in section 610 of this title or an appeal, including a petition for review of administrative action, is noticed for or filed with such a court and that court finds that there is a want of jurisdiction, the court shall, if it is in the interest of justice, transfer such action or appeal to any other such court in which the action or appeal could have been brought at the time it was filed or noticed, and the action or appeal shall proceed as if it had been filed in or noticed for the court to which it is transferred on the date upon which it was actually filed in or noticed for the court from which it is transferred.” (Added by Pub.L. 97-164, Title III, § 301(a), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 55 .)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[Wjhen, as here, the record reveals the considerations relevant to “the interest of justice,” we have dispensed with the convoluted procedure of remanding to the district court to consider whether transfer back to this court is appropriate.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] motion to transfer is unnecessary because of the mandatory cast of section 1631's instructions.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.