United States v. Barry’s Empirical Analysis
814 F.2d 1400 · 1987
Citation profile
52 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably United States v. Rodriguez (1988), United States v. Simas (1991)
52 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act)
Relies on United States v. Russell · Bates v. State Bar · Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Ogilvie · Johnson v. United States · Yazoo County Industrial Development Corp. Et Al. v. Suthoff Et Al.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Inducement requires more than mere suggestion or solicitation by a government agent.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'The defense of entrapment has two elements: (1) the defendant was induced to commit the crime by a government agent, and (2) he was not otherwise predisposed to commit the crime.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Five factors are relevant in determining predisposition: (1) the character of the defendant, (2) who first suggested the criminal activity, (3) whether the defendant engaged in the activity for profit, (4) whether the defendant demonstrated reluctance, and (5) the nature of the government's inducement.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.