Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 814 F.2d 1501 - Pursifull v. Eakin

Pursifull v. Eakin’s Empirical Analysis

814 F.2d 1501 · 1987

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
5
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 12 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably In Re Tucson Estates (1990), Personette v. Kennedy (In Re Midgard Corp.) (1997)

14 federal appellate · 12 district · 5 state decisions

4001987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 102 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334

Relies on Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · In Re Castlerock Properties, Debtor. Piombo Corporation, a California Corporation v. Castlerock Properties, a California Limited Partnership · Browning v. Navarro · Branding Iron Motel, Inc. v. Sandlian Equity, Inc. · Fortier v. Dona Anna Plaza Partners

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[O]n request of a party in interest and after notice and a heáring, the court shall grant relief fi-om the stay provided under subsection (a) of this section, such as by terminating, annulling, modifying, or conditioning such stay — (1) for cause, including the lack of adequate protection of an interest in property of such party in interest. ...”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “discretionary relief from the stay must be determined on a case by case basis.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the issues involved were matters of state law best decided by state courts”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.