Edward v. Paul’s Empirical Analysis
814 F.2d 52 · 1987
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2006
4 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1401 · 20 U.S.C. § 1412 · 20 U.S.C. § 1415 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 1920 · 28 U.S.C. § 753 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Mathews v. Eldridge · Goldberg v. Kelly · City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the right to receive either a written or an electronic verbatim record of the hearing, with the state having the authority to provide either alternative, at its option.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stringer“the State of New Hampshire has provided an electronic recording of the hearing, and so has complied with the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stringer“the right to a written or electronic verbatim record of such hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stringer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.