Rex Systems Inc v. K Holiday US F’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 2004
3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Idaho · United States v. Cooper Corp. · Jefferson County Pharmaceutical Ass'n, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories · Sakamoto v. Duty Free Shoppers, Ltd. · Tele-Communications of Key West, Inc. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the rationale of Cooper relating to the federal government's role as an anti-trust defendant remains unaffected. [ ... ] Since defendants Holiday and Lehman were sued in their official capacities, this reasoning applies to them also. Therefore, we hold that all the federal defendants are not ‘persons’ under the Sherman Act and so subject to suit against them.”); Strickland v. Flue-Cured Tobacco Co-op., 643 F.Supp. 310, 321 (D.S.C.1986) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.