Hernandez v. Dart’s Empirical Analysis
814 F.3d 836 · 2016
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E
Relies on Jones v. Bock · Woodford v. Ngo · Michael Massey and John Otten, M.D. v. David Helman · Strong v. David · Kaba v. Ea Stepp E
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shroud the prisoner in a veil of ignorance and then hide behind a failure to exhaust defense to avoid liability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ramirez v. Young“lifts the PLRA exhaustion requirement entirely and provides immediate entry into federal court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ramirez v. Young“there are multiple indicia that the district court was finished with the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.