Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. Lam’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 15 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “the proceedings in any action or prosecution; a summons or writ, esp. to appear or respond in court.... [pjrocess is so denominated because it proceeds or issues forth in order to bring the defendant into court, to answer the charge preferred against him, and signifies the writs or judicial means by which he is brought to answer.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota

2. “[b]e-cause service and delivery are consistently used synonymously in the context of personal service, there is no basis for us to conclude that the Legislature intended the two terms to be applied differently”); Witso v. Overby, 627 N.W.2d 63 , 67 n. 7 (Minn.2001) (declining to interpret”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. League of Women Voters Minnesota v. Ritchie

3. “interpret each section in light of the surrounding sections to avoid conflicting interpretations.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Verhein v. Piper