Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 814 P.2d 1151 - State v. Kahl

State v. Kahl’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 2025

5 state decisions

301991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carchman v. Nash New Jersey Department of Corrections · Shelton v. United States Board of Parole · United States v. Hill · United States v. Berry · 86 Cal. App. 3d 484 - People v. Castoe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Due process requires reasonable diligence on the part of the State in the issuance and execution of an arrest warrant for an alleged probation violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “To determine whether the State has executed the warrant in a reasonable time, a court must examine all the circumstances of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.