State v. Gardiner’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
1 district · 28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably State v. Wiegmann (1998), 934 So. 2d 1263 - Tillman v. State (2006)
1 district · 28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Weeks v. United States · Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco · See v. City of Seattle · Wright v. State of Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny person who assaults a peace officer, with knowledge that he [or she] is a peace officer, and when the peace officer is acting within the scope of his [or her] authority as a peace officer, is guilty of a class A misdemeanor.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“acting within the scope of his authority as a peace officer,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent““Self-help measures undertaken by a potential defendant who objects to the legality of the search can lead to violence and serious physical injury. The societal interest in the orderly settlement of disputes between citizens and their government outweighs any individual interest in resisting a questionable search. One can reasonably be asked to submit peaceably and to take recourse in his legal remedies.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Trane · State v. Griego
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.