Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 814 SE2D 286 - Yarbrough v. State

Yarbrough v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Weems v. State · Dinning v. State · Williams v. State · Roscoe v. State · Davis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial court's findings of fact will not be deemed to be clearly erroneous if there is any evidence to support them, and this holds true even if the findings are based upon circumstantial evidence and the reasonable inferences which flow from them.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the defendant must show that the State was purposefully attempting through its prosecutorial misconduct to secure an opportunity to retry the case, to avoid reversal of the conviction because of prosecutorial or judicial error, or to otherwise obtain a more favorable chance for a guilty verdict on retrial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.