Leanos v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Lupoe v. State · Scott v. State · Lawrence v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen a witness testifies about a defendant's good character, the State may cross-examine that witness about the defendant's prior misconduct in an attempt to undermine the witness's credibility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Where an appellant fails to meet [his] burden in establishing one prong..., we need not review the other, as a failure to meet either of the prongs is fatal to an ineffectiveness claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. CARR v. the STATE.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.