Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

814 So. 2d 1217

Chatfield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-04-26

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2016

4 state decisions

Relies on Heggs v. State · Ryder TRS, Inc. v. Google

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-04-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1On this direct appeal following resen-tencing pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), appellant argues that his primary offense of sexual battery on a child age twelve or older but less than eighteen by a familial custodian in violation of section 794.011(8)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), should have been scored as a Level 7, rather than a Level 9, offense. He alleges, further, that the error resulted in an improper departure sentence without written reasons. The state concedes that the outcome of this appeal is controlled by our recent decision in Holt v. State, 808 So.2d 290 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Accordingly, as in Holt, we reverse and remand for resentencing scoring the primary offense as a Level 7 offense pursuant to the 1994 guidelines.

¶2REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

ALLEN, C.J., MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
/814/so2d/1217 · .json · Public domain