814 So. 2d 390 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
37 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Leon · Mapp v. Ohio · United States v. Calandra · Michigan v. Tucker · 44 Cal. 2d 434 - People v. Cahan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(4) Patient records are confidential and must not be disclosed without consent of the person to whom they pertain, but appropriate disclosure may be made without such consent ...: .... (d) In any civil or criminal action, unless otherwise prohibited by law, upon the issuance of a subpoena from a court of competent jurisdiction and proper notice by the parties seeking such records to the patient or his or her legal representative.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Sneed v. State · Guardado v. State“An important consideration in this case is the State's repeated attempts to meet the statutory requirements, and the fact that some of the effort was misdirected is not dispositive and should not result in a per se rule that prohibits future compliance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Every natural person has the right to be let alone and free from governmental intrusion into the person's private life....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.