814 So. 2d 402 - Schwab v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Ake v. Oklahoma · 622 So. 2d 982 - Huff v. State · 768 So. 2d 1037 - Occhicone v. State · 774 So. 2d 637 - Rutherford v. Moore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“These videotapes were properly introduced into evidence at trial and are a part of this record. Schwab has failed to demonstrate how he was prejudiced by not having the transcripts of these videotapes in the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Thompson“where the grounds for a judicial bias claim are known at the time of the original trial, yet are not raised, such claims are waived and cannot be raised in a postconviction appeal”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Overton v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.