Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 814 SW2D 14 - State v. Anderson

State v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 1996
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Mallett · State v. Roden · State v. Seeger · State v. Molkenbur · State v. Ware

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There is a ‘modern’ trend to infer an intent to rape from an assailant’s actions and we believe that the facts that were adduced at trial would be sufficient for a jury to find that the [accused] attempted forcible rape on [the victim].” Id. at [2],”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.