Ullius v. Ullius’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2014
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Murphy v. Carron · Edgar v. Fitzpatrick · Hahn v. Hahn · Hartog v. Siegler · Wilkinson v. Tarwater
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A failure to repay money as agreed, standing alone, is not a sufficient reason for equity to intervene to decree an equitable lien. [[Image here]] In order to create an equitable lien by agreement, it is essential that the property or fund sought to be charged be distinctly appropriated to or as security for the payment of the debt or other liability in question. A mere expectation, or even an agreement, that a debt ■will be paid out of a particular fund, a mere promise by a debtor to pay a debt out of a particular fund due him, as soon as he receives it, and a promise to pay a certain debt out of the proceeds of the sale of certain property have been held, respectively, not to be a sufficient appropriation to create a lien thereon.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.