Siegel v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
September 1999
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Lisenba v. People of State of California · Moore v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The holding in Brady requires disclosure only of evidence that is both favorable to the accused and material either to guilt or to punishment. In order to invoke the Brady doctrine, the accused must present evidence that: (1) the prosecution suppressed or withheld evi- denee; (2) this evidence would have been favorable to the accused; and, (3) this evidence would have been material to the accused’s defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Paez v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.