Lyles v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2006
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Eddie Blue v. State · State v. Matyastik · Bailout Bonding Co. v. State · Blue v. State · Pitts v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“even though [he] presented his request for remittitur after final judgment because (1) his response to the [State's] motion for summary judgment made such a request and (2) at the time final judgment was entered he could have relied on the nine-month-delay provision of article 22.16(c)(1) which was declared to be unconstitutional at a later date.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lyles v. State“(a) After forfeiture of a bond and before the expiration of the time limits set by Subsection (c) of this article, the court shall, on written motion, remit to the surety the amount of the bond ... if:”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lyles v. State“should have vacated or modified its February 7, 1990, [final] judgment and granted remittitur in accordance with art. 22.16(a).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lyles v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.