Condict v. Condict’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1404
Relies on Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · Iannelli v. United States · Schreiber Distributing Co. v. Serv-Well Furniture Co. · Morgan v. Bank of Waukegan · Superior Oil Co. v. Fulmer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“conduct of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activities”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Edwards · Condict v. Revelle“required to form pattern). Reaffirming that position in an even more recent case, the Eighth Circuit in Holmberg v. Morrisette, 800 F.2d 205 (8th Cir.1986), reversed a lower court finding of liability on a RICO claim and held that”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“more than twice to arrange the sale of hay in the summer of 1983 and that defendants Grieve, Brown, and MacPherson”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.