Brasier v. Douglas’s Empirical Analysis
815 F.2d 64 · 1987
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2000
7 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Wainwright v. Sykes · Fay v. Noia · Murray v. Carrier · Ake v. Oklahoma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We have previously stated that to determine whether federal habeas corpus relief is barred, the federal habeas court 'must inquire not only if there is a state procedural bar, but whether the state itself applied the bar.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Osborn v. Shillinger“review[s] petitioner's claims on the merits, procedural default d[oes] not preclude the federal habeas court from addressing the claims,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Osborn v. Shillinger“the state courts have not relied exclusively upon”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Osborn v. Shillinger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.