Lane v. Lord’s Empirical Analysis
815 F.2d 876 · 1987
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably United States v. Whaley (1987), United States v. Doran (1989)
14 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Bordenkircher v. Hayes · Blackledge v. Perry · United States v. Goodwin · Thigpen v. Roberts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In deciding whether to move for a mistrial when a jury reports deadlock, a defendant acting completely rationally would compare the likely consequences of allowing the jury to deliberate longer with the likely consequences of obtaining a mistrial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brewster v. Hetzel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.