Jackson v. Riebold’s Empirical Analysis
815 F.3d 1114 · 2016
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Beyerbach v. Sears · Dulany v. Carnahan · Coleman v. Rahija · United States ex rel. Roop v. Hypoguard USA, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“denial of leave to amend a complaint under an abuse of discretion standard; however, when the district court bases its denial on the futility of the proposed amendments, we review the underlying legal conclusions de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a party may amend its pleading only with the opposing party's written consent or the court's leave[,] [and] [t]he court should freely give leave when justice so requires.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The general rule is that summary judgment is appropriate only after the nonmovant has had adequate time for discovery.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.