Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 815 F.3d 177 - Groves v. Communication Workers

Groves v. Communication Workers’s Empirical Analysis

815 F.3d 177 · 2016

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
December 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))

Relies on Vaca v. Sipes · DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters · Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc. · Republic Steel Corp. v. Maddox · United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “some causal nexus between a union's breach of its duty of fair representation and an employee's failure to exhaust contractual remedies”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.