Hassebrock v. Bernhoft’s Empirical Analysis
815 F.3d 334 · 2016
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · 176 Ill. 2d 1 - Advincula v. United Blood Services · 387 Ill. App. 3d 743 - Nettleton v. Stogsdill · 208 Ill. 2d 259 - Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 508 v. Lybrand · United States v. Hassebrock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Even if the argument was not waived ... the [plaintiffs-appellants] failed to support it in this court with anything more than abstract generalities,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.