Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

815 F.3d 733

Docket No. 16-10011.

In re Johnson

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 2016.

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2016-03-10

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2023

6 federal appellate ·

1 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2016-03-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Anthony Johnson, Coleman, FL, pro se.

¶2Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JULIE CARNES, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

¶3BY THE COURT:

¶4A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc,

¶5It is ORDERED that this case will be reheard en banc. The panel’s February 26, 2016 and January 20, 2016 orders are VACATED.

/815/f3d/733 · .json · Public domain