Intermatic, Inc. v. Taymac Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 2014
1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. Hall · Calder v. Jones · Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“precludes a state from exercising jurisdiction over an individual sued in his or her personal capacity if the only basis for jurisdiction is his or her contacts with the forum in which he or she was acting solely as a fiduciary of a corporation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“would decline to adopt the fiduciary shield doctrine and would not follow the decision of the Court of Appeals of Indiana in Ryan.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Keesling v. Winstead“limits the jurisdictional reach of a state to less than that which is allowed by due process”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.