Cason v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
December 2014
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1028 (Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act of 1998) · 18 U.S.C. § 981 (§ 1366 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 983 · 19 U.S.C. § 1607 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 28 U.S.C. § 1355 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Ingalls v. Roosevelt County · Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad v. United States · Ingalls v. Roosevelt County · Evans v. Bf Perkins Company a Division of Standex International Corporation
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.