Bledsoe v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
December 2005
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Powell v. State · Carson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any argument that his sentence violated the Sixth Amendment right to have the facts supporting the enhancement of his sentence determined by a jury, pursuant to Blakely, because he raised such issue for the first time on rehearing when he should have raised it during the direct appeal, ie., the appropriate procedural”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Strong v. State“Given that Carson did not challenge his sentence on direct appeal, he has technically waived review of this issue, and the appropriate procedure would have been to challenge his sentence through post-conviction relief. See Ind. Post-Convietion Rule 1{(1)l(a)(1).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Strong v. State“prior convictions shown by a defendant's criminal history are exempt from the Apprendi rule as clarified by Blakely.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Berry v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.