Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 815 P.2d 193 - State v. Uriarite

State v. Uriarite’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2016

4 state decisions

30199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Weatherford v. Bursey · United States v. Barket · Ashinsky v. State · United States v. Harris · King v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A lesser included offense is a part of the greater offense and the establishment of the essential elements of the greater offense necessarily establishes all the elements required to prove the lesser included offense. Stated another way, an offense is a lesser included one only where the greater offense cannot be committed without necessarily committing the lesser.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Unlawful Possession of CDS With Intent to Distribute Within 1000 Feet of School Grounds”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Unlawful Possession of CDS With Intent to Distribute”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.