State v. Ross’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 34 U.S.C. § 20901 · 42 U.S.C. § 16901 (Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006)
Relies on Cady v. Dombrowski · United States v. Knights · Samson v. California · Grady v. North Carolina · Joytime Distributors & Amusement Co. v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an individualized inquiry into the reasonableness of the [GPS monitoring] search in every case,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“of the widely varying circumstances that may lead to automatic, mandatory electronic monitoring imposed for [misdemeanor] failure to register”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“no longer under the jurisdiction of the sentencing court when he was ordered to be placed on electronic monitoring[,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mitchell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.