Sproles v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2007
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Heidel v. State · 585 So. 2d 1262 - Bush v. State · Laney v. State · 318 So. 2d 879 - Ragan v. State · 530 So. 2d 1356 - King v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“this entitlement is limited to instructions that correctly state the law, are not covered fairly elsewhere in the instructions, and have a foundation in the evidence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“the trial court is not required to grant several instructions on the same question in different verbiage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.