815 So. 2d 698 - Glover v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2007
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 736 So. 2d 44 - D'Ambrosio v. State · 565 So. 2d 1361 - Jesus v. State · 604 So. 2d 1239 - Baker v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Indeed, it seems that if the age of the victim (under twelve) is an element of the offense (and this is recognized by the Standard Jury Instruction on sexual battery of a victim under twelve which was given by the court in the instant case), then the age of the defendant, set out in the same section of the statute creating the offense, should also be.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the jury could not reasonably have found [Glover] to have been less than eighteen. For several days, they viewed this thirty-seven year old defendant sitting in the court room. Further, [Glover's] booking admission that he was born in 1964 was admitted into evidence, and there was no evidence to the contrary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.