Morrison v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Nivica · United States v. Callahan · Melissa E. Debenedetto, a Minor by Her Guardian Ad Litem, Frances Debenedetto v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, an Ohio Corporation, Deborah Samluk Drier v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, an Ohio Corporation · Nunfio v. State · Johnson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Was any of the blood in the hall [appellant’s]?” Appellant's objection that the question called for a hearsay response was sustained and the question was never asked. However, the trial court allowed the State to recall Fickey, over objection, to question him about appellant’s “physical well being” the night of the murder. The State asked Fick-ey whether he had observed”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Morrison v. State“the record demonstrates that the prosecution obtained an unfair advantage from the juror’s question,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Morrison v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.