State v. Chalk’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[w]hen evidence ⅜ * * may nonetheless be helpful to [the] defendant's effective cross-examination of a witness, a defendant’s -right to that evidence arises from the right of confrontation, and thus becomes an issue ‘only when a defendant is improperly denied the ability to confront and to effectively cross-examine an adverse witness at trial,’”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Chaquiro Blandino · State v. Briggs

2. “stature” as a witness in this case. 7 . The standards applied under Rule 16 of the Superior Court Rules of Criminal Procedure and the Brady doctrine are the same only when analyzing”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Briggs

3. “grounds for a new trial regardless of the degree of harm to the defendant.” State v. Chalk, 816 A.2d 413 , 419 (R.I.2002). This standard”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. DeCiantis v. Wall