United States v. Marks’s Empirical Analysis
816 F.2d 1207 · 1987
Citation profile
52 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably United States v. Moya-Gomez (1988), United States v. Briscoe (1990)
52 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Polizzi · United States v. Lewis · United States v. Shackleford · United States v. Andrus · United States v. Beasley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[0]ne who buys from a conspirator for resale is a member of the conspiracy if he knows at least its general aims.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]f the witness answers 'no', the lawyer can then try to prove that the witness indeed made the statement, but the witness must at that point be given an opportunity to explain or deny it, i.e. to rebut the cross-examiner's proof.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Frequently the principal witnesses in drug cases are turncoat former associates of the defendants, and their credibility is for the jury to determine.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.