Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Reeves’s Empirical Analysis
816 F.2d 130 · 1987
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 6 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably Pyramid Securities Limited v. Ib Resolution Inc (1991), Chew v. Gates (1994)
15 federal appellate · 6 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 657
Relies on Ohio v. Kentucky · California v. Sierra Club · Lawrence v. United States · Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique · Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. Fox
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“ensur[e] that the opposing party has enough notice of the alleged error to permit an attempt to cure it before resting.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[pjlaintiff had adequate notice of this challenge from defendant’s answers to the complaint and amended complaint, and there is no suggestion that plaintiff could have produced any additional evidence that would have been pertinent to this legal issue. We will not be forced to recognize a cause of action because of a procedural error which did not prejudice the plaintiff.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“When payment of the judgment in full is made by the judgment debtor, there is no doubt that the plaintiff is barred from a further action against another who is liable for the same damages....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.