United States v. Duncan’s Empirical Analysis
816 F.2d 153 · 1987
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2004
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 287 · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act) · 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (False Claims Act)
Relies on United States Marcus v. Hess · United States v. Neifert-White Co. · United States v. McNinch · United States v. Cohn · 407 F. Supp. 261 - United States v. Winchester
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Regardless of whether a false voucher is submitted for a credit or for reimbursement, the government potentially suffers a monetary loss.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.