Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 816 F.2d 332 - Turnock v. Cope

Turnock v. Cope’s Empirical Analysis

816 F.2d 332 · 1987

Citation profile

105
cited by 105 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 105 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably Boit v. Gar-Tec Products, Inc. (1992), Rar Incorporated v. Turner Diesel Limited (1997)

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

6601987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 22 Ill. 2d 432 - Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp. · 11 Ill. 2d 378 - Nelson v. Miller · Green v. Advance Ross Electronics Corp. · 87 Ill. 2d 190 - Cook Associates, Inc. v. Lexington United Corp. · O'Hare International Bank v. Hampton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 105 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only if a court of the state in which it sits would have such jurisdiction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “long arm jurisdiction may not be exercised in every situation that the minimum contacts test under the due process clause would permit,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.