Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

816 F.2d 671

Docket No. 86-7742.

Finch v. Richardson

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Feb. 19, 1987. Decided April 16, 1987.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1987-04-16

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 1987

24 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1987-04-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Before WIDENER, SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Charles Ray Finch, Appellant Pro Se.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec.l983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Finch v. Richardson, C/A No. 86-982-CRT (E.D.N.C., Nov. 13, 1986).

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/816/f2d/671 · .json · Public domain