International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Brock’s Empirical Analysis
816 F.2d 761 · 1987
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2017 · most notably National Labor Relations Board v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 23 (1987), National Labor Relations Board Union v. Federal Labor Relations Authority (1987)
27 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 19 U.S.C. § 2101 (Customs and Trade Act of 1990) · 19 U.S.C. § 2291 · 19 U.S.C. § 2311 · 19 U.S.C. § 2319 · 38 U.S.C. § 2011 · 38 U.S.C. § 2013
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unless there are compelling indications that it is wrong.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a pure question of statutory construction”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the second prong of the Chevron test is only applicable ... when an agency is required to apply a legal standard to a particular set of facts, or when a court is unable to discern congressional intent after employing traditional tools of statutory construction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.