Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 816 F.2d 980 - United States v. Basey

United States v. Basey’s Empirical Analysis

816 F.2d 980 · 1987

Citation profile

191
cited by 191 later decisions
8
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

148 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 191 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably United States v. Shabazz (1993), United States v. Causey (1987)

148 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions

10301987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2510 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 47 U.S.C. § 605

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Bruton v. United States · United States v. Cortez · Adams v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 191 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he 'reasonable suspicion' standard does not require that officers have probable cause . . . or that the circumstances be such that there is no reasonable hypothesis of innocent behavior.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “they were satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that a conspiracy existed and that a defendant was one of the members of it, then that defendant assumed the responsibility for the acts and statements of all other members made in furtherance of the conspiracy.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[a] critical consideration in Bruton claims is whether the out-of-court statement at issue clearly implicates the codefendant; if the statement does not do so, no serious Bruton issue is presented.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.