Bryant v. Wyeth, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 district · 2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “The requirement of proof of an affirmative act refers not to proof of the act that gives rise to the claim but rather to a subsequent affirmative act of concealment. See Liddell v. First Family Financial Servs., Inc., 146 Fed.Appx. 748, 751 (5th Cir.2005) (highlighting that part of Mississippi fraudulent concealment doctrine requiring that affirmative acts of concealment must occur “after the transactions at issue”); Ross v. Citifinancial, Inc., 344 F.3d 458, 464 (5th Cir.2003) (“Mississippi law is unambiguous: Plaintiffs must prove a subsequent affirmative act of fraudulent concealment to toll the limitations.”).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 897 F. Supp. 2d 489 - Alexander v. Wyeth

2. “that any delay ha[d] adversely affected its ability to fully and adequately respond to the motion on the facts and the law.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Kenneth T. Riso & a. v. Gregory R. Riso & a.