Aiken v. Stanley’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Parkhurst v. Van Winkle · Abouhalkah v. Sharps
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“necessary to bring about a cessation of the violence or the threat of violence,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“to promote the (1) protection and safety of all victims of domestic or family violence in a fair, prompt, and effective manner; and (2) prevention of future domestic and family violence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Moore v. Moore · As v. TH“(a) A person who is or has been a victim of domestic or family violence may file a petition for an order for protection against a: (1) family or household member who commits an act of domestic or family violence; or (2) person who has committed stalking under [I.C. § ] 35-45-10-5 or a sex offense under [Indiana Code chapter] 35-42-4 against the petitioner.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Moore v. Moore · Mysliwy v. Mysliwy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.