Mallard v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cox v. State · Armour v. State · Rogers v. State · Grafe v. State · Griesinger v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e can reasonably infer that our General Assembly considered the heightened risk to a confined victim if the perpetrator is armed with a deadly weapon when it determined that a Class B felony enhancement was warranted in such cases.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Nicoson v. State · Nicoson v. State“under the plain language of the statute, the State is only required to prove that the defendant committed the offense of criminal confinement 'while armed with a deadly weapon”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nicoson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.